Newcomb's paradox
You are faced with two boxes. In one you can see $1,000, but you cannot see what is in the other. You may take either box singly, or you may take both. You are told that a Supreme Being has already placed $1,000,000 in the closed box if He has predicted that you would take only the closed box. Otherwise, He has put nothing there. Furthermore this is how it has always turned out: those who have taken the one closed box have found $1,000,000, but those who took both got only $1,000. Do you take both boxes, or just the closed box? The argument for taking both is that the Supreme Being has already made his move. Whatever He has done, you get $1,000 + the contents of the closed box by choosing both, so this choice dominates any other choice (see dominance ). The argument for choosing just the closed box is that the people who make this choice are the people who end up rich.

Philosophy dictionary. . 2011.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Newcomb's paradox — Newcomb s paradox, also referred to as Newcomb s problem, is a thought experiment involving a game between two players, one of whom purports to be able to predict the future. Whether the problem is actually a paradox is disputed. Newcomb s… …   Wikipedia

  • Braess's paradox — Braess s paradox, credited to the mathematician Dietrich Braess, states that adding extra capacity to a network, when the moving entities selfishly choose their route, can in some cases reduce overall performance. This is because the equilibrium… …   Wikipedia

  • Newcomb — may refer to: Contents 1 People 2 Places 3 Other uses 4 …   Wikipedia

  • William Newcomb — William Newcomb, a professor and theoretical physicist at the University of California s Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, is best known as the creator of Newcomb s paradox, devised in 1960. He was the great grandson of the brother of the astronomer …   Wikipedia

  • Kavka's toxin puzzle — is a thought experiment about the possibility of forming an intention to perform an act which, following from reason, is an action one would not actually perform. It was presented by moral and political philosopher Gregory S. Kavka in The Toxin… …   Wikipedia

  • Ontological paradox — An ontological paradox is a paradox of time travel that questions the existence and creation of information and objects that travel in time. It is very closely related to the predestination paradox and usually occurs at the same time. Because of… …   Wikipedia

  • Predestination paradox — A predestination paradox (also called causal loop, causality loop, and, less frequently, closed loop or closed time loop) is a paradox of time travel that is often used as a convention in science fiction. It exists when a time traveller is caught …   Wikipedia

  • Bootstrap paradox — The bootstrap paradox is a paradox of time travel in which information or objects can exist without having been created. After information or an object is sent back in time, it is recovered in the present and becomes the very object/information… …   Wikipedia

  • Paradoja de Newcomb — Saltar a navegación, búsqueda La paradoja de Newcomb es el estudio de un juego entre dos jugadores, uno de los cuales puede predecir el futuro. La paradoja de Newcomb se considera una paradoja porque lleva a una autocontradicción. La causalidad… …   Wikipedia Español

  • Braess-Paradox — Das Braess Paradoxon ist eine Veranschaulichung der Tatsache, dass eine zusätzliche Handlungsalternative unter der Annahme rationaler Einzelentscheidungen zu einer Verschlechterung der Situation für alle führen kann. Das Paradoxon wurde 1968 vom… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”